Decided enough is enough with my Husaria contest between Poles and Muscovites.

Just “guided” units to set up cavalry confrontations in the center.  Guiding is my polite term for “to hell with the rules, let’s get these units into position.”  Yes, to do so would have involved finagling figures through expansion/contraction of frontage gyrations, as well as the timing of said moves.  Said finaglings would have expanded my deeper knowledge of the rules, but in my current bloody mood, it would have just been another experience tantamount to a telephone hold (thank goodness for the speaker setting on cellphones).

Now that the units are in general position, I can pick up the game using Rules As Written (RAW), and see what happens with cavalry combat.  To this point, all combats have involved infantry units.

Here’s the overall situation:

Poles to the right, Muscovites to the left.  The flanks are secure for both sides.  The Polish Pancerni are moving into attack position, as are the Muscovite heavy cavalry and Ratjars.  The center area is narrow and becoming congested for the Muscovites.  Since both sides are now within charge distance (28 cm), the Muscovites may not be able to expand their frontage before first contact.   In this rule set, only the front rank of Cavalry fights in melee.  However, rear ranks can overlap after the initial melee turn.

This photo gives  little better view of the Muscovite situation.  The cavalry in the foreground is retreating (not routing) and will pass through, and disrupt, the Streltsy infantry.

The Polish objectives are the two villages.  With that in mind, the Muscovite CinC (single figure top center)  has moved to rally the withdrawing cavalry units and direct the reorganization of  each village’s defenses.

I’ll pick this one up with the usual turn sequence, starting with declaration of charges for whichever side wins the initiative die roll.

High winds with rain turning to snow.  Focus at a time like this?  Just TSATF?  Why not get the Husaria re-set going?

I have the roster sheets filled out, and the armies deployed.  All I need to do is annotate each unit’s initial orders.

Very curious to see the impact of the additional generals,  new light horse units, and a  morale upgrade  to veteran status for selected units will have on the game.

A couple of marginal photos to document preparations.

This marginal shot is looking north.

The Muscovites now have Cossack infantry instead of Dragoons in the woods, with Kalmuck light horse in support.  Ratjars will support the Cossack infantry deployed on the east hill.  Also, there are two medium guns emplaced on the hill between the villages.  Streltsy infantry, supported by cavalry, hold the center.

The Poles have fewer dragoons facing the woods, only one heavy gun (instead of the multiple batteries in the previous game), and Cossack cavalry – supported by Ratjars – on their right flank.  Again, the Hussars are off-table and situated to the rear of the Pancerni (now upgraded to Veteran status) supporting the Haiduks in the center.

Game is sputtering along, with my bleatings about Initiative and Response checks a broken record , especially with the Experienced level units  forming the bulk of both armies.

Sat down last night and worked my way through these problems.

Experienced units need a modified Initiative percentage die  roll of 40 or lower to charge or respond to a new order (not to mention fire or move for the first time in the game).

Without command figures in close proximity, the chances of passing are pretty low.

Response tests are also problematic, especially for units with over ten percent casualties (that’s the loss of only one (1) figure for most units).   This test involves a base Morale Value Against Percentage Losses Suffered, added an average die roll, then modified.

Once again, the proximity of a unit’s General and unengaged friendly units is helpful.

An example:  An Experienced unit with ten percent casualties has a base morale value of 5.  In order to remain “Steady”, in response to an event,  it must have a modified score of eleven (11).  Assuming a die roll of three (3), it still needs a net of three positive modifiers to remain “Steady”.

The lesson learned is to increase the number of generals per army, and keep troops close proximity to one another.

If this doesn’t happen, most units will refuse to charge or hold, instead retreating or routing after absorbing a limited number of casualties.

In this game, the Cossacks continue to march up “their” hill, come into contact (or threat of contact), and retreat back down.  Same for the Muscovite cavalry in the center.  They absorb a casualty loss from Haiduk musketry, and then fall back.

Very tempted to reset.  On the other hand, I’d like to get my Transylvanians on the table.

The daily game playing momentum has slowed. Surprising, because once I get going, the game’s very enjoyable.

Interesting set of rules.  Despite the many charts and modifiers, the play is quick, and far less procedural than Wargames Research Group (WRG)  6^th  Edition.  Husaria’s narrative allows some latitude in application.

For example: How far does a unit retreat? Is it full move, move modified for formation changes, does the unit deduct for turning 180 degrees, or what? Not complaining because it allows for applying some common sense.

Another puzzler is what happens when a unit fails its Charge Initiative Test? Does the target unit still have to take a Response Test. The answer is “Yes” in WRG 6^th .  Here, I’m not so sure. I’ve tried it both ways and have decided that if the unit fails its Initiative Test, the target does not have to test. An outcome of both units retreating is, while possible, not that plausible.

This game is full of frictions. First off, it is very difficult for “Experienced” units (which make up the bulk of units in this game) to pass the Initiative Test to charge and also difficult for them to roll for positive Response Test outcome. As a result, and I’m sure this was intended, plans do not go as anticipated.

This breakdown has caused both generals to scamper around the battlefield changing orders. The order changes are not formulated until the last phase of the turn, communicated during the next turn’s movement phase, and take effect the following turn. By that time, events may have rendered the new order moot or even counter-productive.

One interesting rule involves following up a unit that “gives ground” after losing Combat (melee). The victorious unit can only follow if it has the distance needed remaining from its charge movement allowance. If not, the victorious unit must charge again the next turn. This happened to the Russian cavalry in the center. They failed the subsequent charge test, remained stationary, and were then forced to retreat as a result of Polish musketry.

If you enjoy some chaos in your gaming, this rule set provides it. For me, especially playing solo, this is not a bad thing. And, I don’t mind working within a relatively loose framework. Again, this is after playing the very scripted WRG 6^th Edition Rules.

Here’s a summary of the past five (5) turns.

The Polish attempt to hold the east hill using Ratjars failed. However, the Cossack Infantry also withdrew (see comments about mutual failed tests, above). The Cossacks are now working their way back up the hill, but staying on the reverse slope to avoid artillery bombardment. The Polish commander has sent his remaining Ratjars to drive off the Cossacks.

The Haiduks drove off the first wave of Russian cavalry, and holds the center. The Polish Pancerni remain uncommitted, with the Hussars still to their rear and off the table.

The Russian Dragoons holding the forest have been forced to withdraw, with Polish Haiduks advancing through the forest towards the East village.

The Russian Streltsy have retreated to the villages, with orders to defend. The Russian heavy cavalry is beginning to deploy to support another attempt to break the Haiducks holding the center.